Monday, November 05, 2012



I smell that same rat... I know so many libs that have never gotten over the Bush/Gore contest... the mantra is that the election was stolen. Someone is setting this one up. Can you see it... like the Arab world finding that the coalition had entered Bagdad very forcefully and they were utterly shocked. They had heard the stream coming from Bagdad Bob that our forces were receiving a decimating right punch from Saddam... they believed it. The libs believe the polls as unbalanced (the polls) as they are... tomorrow night they'll begin howling, "How could Mitt have won so handily after all the polls said the race was even? The election was stolen!" A set up, pure Chicago!
BH

On FNC’s “Special Report” Monday night, Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume said that many mainstream polls — which appear to indicate President Barack Obama will win a second term — may be fundamentally flawed.
“My sense about this is fairly simple,” Hume said. “We’re looking at a national race, which is, for all intents and purposes, tied. We are looking at a set of state polls in the battleground states that suggests President Obama is leading — he is leading in most of these polls. And most reporters would look at that and say, ‘Well, if that’s the case, it looks like President Obama is going to win.’ And that is what a lot of people think. That is kind of the conventional wisdom.”
“However, a number of those polls have a remarkably large number of Democrats in the sample — more Democrats, in some cases, than turned out by percentage on Election Day four years ago, which was a big year for the Democrats,” Hume continued. “They don’t expect to have as big a year. So, those polls are troubling. Now, it would be unprecedented for this many polls reflecting a similar outcome to be wrong, which is why I think people are reluctant to draw that conclusion. But there’s something wrong here.”