Friday, September 29, 2023

Mexico Vows to Deport Illegal Immigrants

 


Mexico Vows to Deport Illegal Immigrants From Border Cities,

Stop Deadly Hitchhiking on Trains

Mexico said it hopes to 'depressure' its northern border cites by sending migrants back to their home countries.

Bill Pan, The Epoch Times 

Mexico will deport illegal immigrants from cities on its border with the United States and take measures to deter people from risking their lives trying to hitch a ride on cargo trains traveling to the northern border, the country's immigration authority said.

The Mexican National Migration Institute (INM) made the announcement following a Sept. 23 meeting with representatives of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Ferromex, the operator of Mexico's largest freight rail network.

The agency said it expects that the move will help "depressurize" the Mexican border cities of Ciudad Juárez, Piedras Negras, and Tijuana, and the border state of Tamaulipas, which have been overwhelmed by the recent surge of people seeking to illegally enter the United States.

As part of an agreement made during the meeting, CBP will hand over to the INM the illegal immigrants who have been expelled from the United States through the Ciudad Juárez International Bridge, and the Mexican government will "carry out negotiations with the governments of Venezuela, Brazil, Nicaragua, Colombia, and Cuba so that they receive their compatriots."

"In September alone, 189,000 migrants have been rescued, with an average of 9,000 per day," the INM said in a statement. "People from 191 different nationalities are passing through Mexico, primarily from Venezuela, Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador, Haiti and El Salvador."

The Mexican agency didn't specify when the deportations will start or how long they would last.

"We are continuing to work closely with our partners in Mexico to increase security and address irregular migration along our shared border," CBP Acting Commissioner Troy A. Miller, who attended the meeting, said in a statement. "The United States and Mexico remain committed to stemming the flow of irregular migration driven by unscrupulous smugglers, while maintaining access to lawful pathways."

Train-Hoppers Paralyze Rail Network

The Sept. 23 meeting comes after Ferromex was forced to suspend 60 of its freight trains running in the northern part of Mexico because of an "unprecedented" surge in deadly attempts by illegal migrants to hitch rides on those units.

Grupo México, the parent company of Ferromex, said last week that there had been "nearly half a dozen cases of injuries or deaths" in recent days among groups of people who boarded freight trains en route to the U.S.–Mexico border, "in spite of the grave danger this implies."

The cargo trains, including one infamously referred to by migrants as "The Beast" or "The Train of Death," for years have been used by illegal immigrants to speed up the nearly 2,000-mile trek from Mexico's southern border to its northern border.

In a video that has been widely circulated on social media, a Ferromex cargo train packed with the illegal migrants was spotted heading toward the U.S.–Mexico border. The hitchhikers can been seen cheering, clapping, and whistling while riding on top of the cargo, with some even hanging from the sides of the cars and waving at the camera.

The video was reportedly taken in Zacatecas, which is in the north-central part of Mexico. It was shared widely after Fox News reporter Griff Jenkins posted it on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, on Sept. 17, saying that the passengers were "clearly not heeding" advice from Vice President Kamala Harris, who said, in a statement directed at the would-be illegal immigrants, "Do not come."

US Border Towns Pushed to Breaking Point

The announcement also comes as the Texas cities of Eagle Pass and El Paso struggle to address the surge of illegal border crossings.

Eagle Pass Mayor Rolando Salinas Jr., a Democrat, said that more than 6,000 illegal immigrants have crossed into his city in just two days and thousands more are expected to pass through in the coming days. The city itself has a population of only about 28,000.

"Nothing that we've seen ever really—to have so many people crossing in without consequence and congregating at the international bridge," the mayor told Texas Public Radio, after signing a seven-day emergency declaration to "request financial resources to provide the additional services" required by the influx.

Meanwhile, in El Paso, where another wave of illegal border crossing brought more than 2,000 people per day, shelter capacity and other resources are being strained to "a breaking point," city officials said. Just six weeks ago, the city was seeing about 350 to 400 people coming in per day.

"The city of El Paso only has so many resources and we have come to ... a breaking point right now," Mayor Oscar Leeser, a Democrat, said at a news conference on Sept. 23.

According to Mr. Leeser, about two-thirds of those new arrivals are single men. An estimated 32 percent are families, and just 2 percent are unaccompanied children.

"I think it's really important to note that we have a broken immigration system," he said. "It's the same thing over and over again."


Monday, September 25, 2023

Biden poll freakout

 


Biden poll freakout

Byron York, Chief Political Correspondent, Washington Examiner 

The political and media world fell into a mini-frenzy over the weekend with the release of not one but two polls showing President Joe Biden in dire political shape.

The most newsworthy of the polls came from the Washington Post and ABC News. Biden's job approval rating in the new survey is 37%, with disapproval at 56%. Approval of his handling of the economy is 30%. Approval of his handling of the border crisis is 23%. The survey found deep unhappiness about the state of the economy in general, energy prices, food prices, and the income of average workers. Only 33% of Democrats said they want Biden to run for a second term, versus 62% who don't.

Those are terrible numbers for a sitting president, but truth be told, they're not all that different from the results we've seen in many polls in recent months. So why the frenzy? Because of this question from the pollsters: "If the 2024 presidential election were being held today and the candidates were Donald Trump and Joe Biden, for whom would you vote? Would you lean toward Trump or Biden?" The result was decisive: Trump held a 10-point lead, 52% to 42%, among registered voters.

What? Trump with a 10-point lead? The prospect was too awful for the Washington Post and many others in the media. It must be wrong! An outlier! Indeed, in the headline and again in the article, the Washington Post declared its own finding an "outlier." "The sizable margin of Trump's lead in this survey is significantly at odds with other public polls that show the general election contest a virtual dead head," the Washington Post reported. "The difference between this poll and others, as well as the unusual makeup of Trump's and Biden's coalitions in this survey, suggest it is probably an outlier."

Other observers went slightly bonkers over the result. As Mollie Hemingway noted: "Democrat analyst Larry Sabato, who confidently predicted Hillary Clinton would win 352 electoral votes in 2016 (she received 227 in her loss to Donald Trump), asked the Washington Post, 'How could you even publish a poll so absurd on its face? Will be a lingering embarrassment for you.'" A number of other voices said similar things.

One odd note was that the Washington Post did not cast doubt on the other results from this poll, so the paper must not believe that the survey was fundamentally flawed from start to finish. It was just the Trump-beats-Biden figure. It should be said that polls are never a predictor of what is going to happen more than a year from now. Instead, they are a snapshot of how people feel today, which might change significantly in the coming months. Also, this poll could be completely wrong. But the selective outrage over one of the poll's findings was striking.

It was particularly striking given the finding of the other poll released over the weekend, this one from NBC News. It, too, asked the Biden vs. Trump question, but it found the race to be tied at 46% to 46%. So obviously that was a big difference from the Washington Post poll. It doesn't say which one is right or whether either one is right.

But here is the news in the NBC poll. In addition to asking about a Biden versus Trump scenario, it also asked about Biden versus some other Republican candidates. And when the pollsters asked voters about a contest between Biden and Republican Nikki Haley, Haley came out ahead by 5 points, 46% to 41%. (In the other match polled, Biden vs. Ron DeSantis, Biden edged the Florida governor, 46% to 45%.)

Haley beating Biden by 5 points? That's news. Maybe even bigger news than Biden trailing Trump by 10 points. It's news because it suggests Biden's vulnerability not just to Trump but to at least one other Republican, Haley, whom voters see as a plausible alternative to the current president.

Both polls show Biden in bad political shape. There's really no dispute about that. But these new polls from the Washington Post-ABC and NBC News take Biden's problem to a new level of concern among Democrats. For the moment at least — and remember, the poll is a snapshot of just this moment — the president is losing ground not just to Trump but to at least one other Republican challenger as well.

For a deeper dive into many of the topics covered in the Daily Memo, please listen to my podcast, The Byron York Show — available on Radio America and the Ricochet Audio Network and everywhere else podcasts can be found.

Please share there were 4,859 visitors last week.

Wednesday, September 20, 2023

John Fetterman a US Senator, Really?

 


Does John Fetterman Really Want to Be a Senator?

Jim Geraghty, National Review 

On the menu today: Pennsylvania senator John Fetterman thinks everyone is being ridiculous for getting hung up on the Senate dress code — revoked for senators only; staffers, pages, and visitors must continue to “dress appropriately” — and that people shouldn’t focus on that. Fine, let’s take a look at Fetterman’s record since he was sworn in, including an absence rate that is only exceeded by California senator Dianne Feinstein’s. Even beyond his stroke recovery and mental-health struggles, Fetterman has said he finds the Senate to be fixated on dumb things, and he’s understandably pained by the long stretches of separation from his family. Obviously, Fetterman doesn’t think the job is worth the aggravation of putting on a suit. In light of all this . . . is Fetterman being a senator really the right choice for anyone? Most notably, even for himself?

Why Do You Run for Senate If You Think the Institution Is Dumb?

If you’re a man who really hates wearing a suit, then perhaps being a U.S. Senator isn’t the job for you. I assume that before he made the choice to run for Senate, John Fetterman had seen the Senate. C-SPAN is on just about every cable system. The notion that male senators wear suits up on Capitol Hill, and in particular when they’re on the floor of the chamber, cannot possibly have been a surprise to him.

In fact, back in October 2022, when a Pittsburgh radio-show host asked Fetterman, “Will you wear your hoodie on the Senate floor?” the candidate responded, “I’m going to only wear what you’re supposed to wear and whatever dress code.” Eh, never mind, I suppose.

You probably noticed that the U.S. Senate has dropped its dress code for senators, and the reason is pretty much that Fetterman doesn’t want to wear a suit anymore. You may not have seen a July interview with the New York Times, in which Fetterman told the paper, “It was a eureka moment when I figured out I don’t have to be in a suit to stand at the threshold of the Senate chamber, going ‘yea’ or ‘nay,’ and it was amazing. I’ve been able to reduce my suit time by about 75 percent.”

Our Jeff Blehar writes today, “The relaxation of the code applies only to the senators, not their pages, staffers, or to visitors. That is telling as to Majority Leader Schumer’s concern about maintaining some semblance of standards (he himself felt the need to stipulate in his announcement that he would continue to wear a suit, which is a shame; I think we’d all prefer to see what Schumer looks like in a Hawaiian shirt, shorts, and sandals).” Eh, speak for yourself, Jeff.

The website for the U.S. Capitol visitor center still states, “The Capitol is a working office building. Please dress appropriately and behave in a respectful manner.”

Fetterman, unsurprisingly, thinks everyone is overreacting to his choice of attire:

“Oh my god!” Mr. Fetterman said sarcastically on Tuesday of the hand-wringing about what would become of the nation’s Capitol if he were to preside over the Senate in a hoodie. “I think it will be OK. The Republicans think I’m going to burst through the doors and start break dancing on the floor in shorts. I don’t think it’s going to be a big issue.”

Fetterman doesn’t want to be judged by his wardrobe. Okay. Let’s look at his record since joining the Senate.

So far in his Senate career, Fetterman has missed 33.4 percent of the Senate votes. He is the chamber’s second-most absent member, behind Dianne Feinstein of California, who has missed 46.3 percent of the votes this session. Much of Fetterman’s absence was during his six-week stay at Walter Reed Medical Center in treatment for clinical depression — he missed 85 percent of the votes in February and March. But not all of it was from that time period; Fetterman also missed 13 percent of the votes from July to September.

On July 19, he missed a vote to require the president to consult Congress before withdrawing from NATO. On July 11, he missed a confirmation vote on Xochitl Torres Small to be deputy secretary of Agriculture. And two days later, he missed confirmation votes for Kalpana Kotagal to be a member of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and David M. Uhlmann to be assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Confirmation votes like those are not the most exciting, dramatic, or consequential tasks of a senator, but they are part of the job. I would have figured that a guy who missed so many votes out of the gate would have tried to avoid missing many more for the rest of the session. The U.S. Senate has a lot of “state work periods” in which lawmakers aren’t in session, and the chamber rarely holds floor votes before Monday night or after Thursday evening. It’s not like Fetterman has the commuting challenges of senators from Hawaii, Alaska, or the West Coast.

In that New York Times interview in July, Fetterman did not sound like he was enjoying his new life as a senator. He told the paper that he thinks the Senate has “a fixation on a lot of dumb s***. Bad performance art is really what it gets down to.”

Mind you, this is not the fuming of a minority-party backbencher with no real influence. Schumer’s running the Senate, and Fetterman was assigned to the Agriculture, Banking, and Environment committees, the Joint Economic Committee, and the Special Committee on Aging, a pretty good selection for a freshman senator.

Understandably, the time away from family is weighing heavily on Fetterman. “When you become a senator, you’re going to be spending 50 percent less time with the people that you love. That breaks my heart. I get emotional thinking about it. FaceTime is much better than just a phone call, but that’s the worst part of the job.”

In a cover-story profile for Time, Fetterman said that when he checked himself into Walter Reed, he was “gaunt, listless, barely able to function.” He told the magazine, “He didn’t actively contemplate suicide . . . but he would have welcomed death if it came.”

I’m very glad Fetterman is in a much better mental space now; everyone should be.

But I read all of that and think . . . should John Fetterman be a senator? For his own sake? By his own admission, he thinks the institution is “fixated” on dumb things and hates being away from his family. Within a few weeks of his arrival, he was struck by crippling depression that required hospitalization. And he’s also attempting to recover from a life-threatening stroke. The state of Pennsylvania has roughly 12 million people. Are we absolutely sure there’s nobody else in the state who could do this job?

Allow me to offer a completely different theory on Fetterman’s insistence that he keep wearing his old clothes when at work in the Senate. Pretend you must describe John Fetterman to someone who’s never seen or heard of him, without referring to his appearance.

He’s not known for his soaring oratory. In fact, it’s not likely that you remember anything in particular he’s ever said. He’s not known for being a bipartisan dealmaker; as lieutenant governor, he rarely ingratiated himself with members of the Pennsylvania legislature. He was mayor of Braddock, a small town where the mayoral-vote totals don’t exceed three digits, a place so devastated by decades of economic decline that it was used as a filming location for the post-apocalyptic movie The Road. Fetterman meant well as mayor, but it’s hard to say the town experienced a remarkable renaissance during his tenure. And as lieutenant governor, Fetterman worked the lightest of schedules; his “daily schedule was blank during roughly one-third of workdays from January 2019, when he first took office, to May of this year, when he suffered a serious stroke,” the AP reported.

What is John Fetterman known for? The way he looks and the way he dresses.

Back in October of last year, I went through all the profiles of Fetterman written over the years, and almost all of them were fixated on Fetterman’s unusual appearance:

Way back in 2009, Ed Pilkington of the Guardian called him, “America’s coolest mayor” and gushed, “Everything about him stands out from the crowd. . . . He is 6ft 8in tall and weighs 300lbs. With a shaven head, big ears and a goatee, he looks like a James Bond baddie rather than the political leader of a community in the north-eastern US. He walks around town dressed in black workers’ overalls and steelworkers’ boots.” Around that same time, a Rolling Stone profile of “The Mayor of Hell,” written by Janet Reitman began, “John Fetterman looks a lot like a convict. For starters, he’s 6-feet-8, weighs 320 pounds, and has a shaved head and a bushy chin beard. He dresses most of the time in modified prison garb: Dickies work shirt, baggy jeans, black steel-toe Dr. Martens. His arms are the size of small trees. He also sports some impressively large tattoos.”

In a 2011 New York Times magazine profile calling him “the Mayor of Rust,” Sue Halpern described him as “a 6-foot-8 white man with a shaved head, a fibrous black beard and tattoos up one arm and down the other . . . a guy in biker boots bringing the Park Slope (Aspen, Marin, Portland, Santa Fe) ethos — organic produce, art installations, an outdoor bread oven — to the disenfranchised.”

A bit more recently, James Bennet, the brother of Colorado Democratic senator Michael Bennet, wrote in The Economist that, “Fetterman defies all political convention. Well over two metres tall, bald and goateed, he sports a hoodie and baggy shorts regardless of weather or occasion. At rallies he extends his long arms, taking the crowd in a virtual hug and revealing the tattoos lining his forearms.” Most recently, Rebecca Traister of New York magazine called him, “an enormous white man who had played offensive tackle in college and appeared to be built of all the XXL parts at the Guy Factory.”

In Politico, Holly Otterbein acknowledged the obvious: that Fetterman’s distinctive size and appearance are a big reason why he became one of the most frequently profiled small-town mayors in American history. “Fetterman is one of the most photographed rising stars in the Democratic Party. As gargantuan as Lurch Addams, with a bald head, goatee and closet full of Dickies shirts — and tattoos running down his arm marking every date a life was taken while he was mayor of his hard-knock steel town — Pennsylvania’s lieutenant governor is a cartoon image of a working guy from the Rust Belt. Which is catnip for glossy magazine spreads.”

The way Fetterman dresses is his brand, his signature, the key to his appeal. He looks like a really big blue-collar guy, even if his life experience is quite different from what people assume.

Put Fetterman in a suit, where he can’t show off the arm tattoos, and he’s just a really tall, really big, bald senator.

Finally, lest we forget, part of Fetterman’s election depended upon a lengthy effort to mislead voters into believing his recovery was progressing well ahead of schedule.

A little less than a year ago, John Fetterman’s doctor, Dr. Clifford Chen, wrote a letter, released by his campaign, declaring, “Overall, Lt. Gov. Fetterman is well and shows strong commitment to maintaining good fitness and health practices, He has no work restrictions and can work full duty in public office.” Fetterman declined to release in-depth medical records.

And then, about a week later, Fetterman went out onto a debate stage and struggled to communicate. As Joe Scarborough summarized afterwards, “John Fetterman’s ability to communicate is seriously impaired. Pennsylvania voters will be talking about this obvious fact even if many in the media will not.”


Monday, September 18, 2023

Post-Postmodern America

 

San Francisco city council meeting...

Post-Postmodern America

Victor Davis Hanson, Victorhanson.com 

When the progressive woke revolution took over traditional America, matters soon reached the level of the ridiculous.

Take the following examples of woke craziness and hypocrisy, perhaps last best witnessed during Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution.

The Biden administration from its outset wished to neuter immigration law. It sought to alter radically the demography of the U.S. by stopping the border wall and allowing into the United States anyone who could walk across the southern border.

Over seven million did just that. Meanwhile, Biden ignored the role of the Mexican cartels in causing nearly 100,000 ANNUAL American fentanyl deaths.

Then border states finally wised up.

They grasped that the entire open-borders, “new Democratic majority” leftwing braggadocio was predicated on its hypocritical architects staying as far away as possible from their new constituents.

So cash strapped border states started busing their illegal aliens to sanctuary blue-state jurisdictions.

Almost immediately, once magnanimous liberals, whether in Martha’s Vineyard, Chicago, or Manhattan, stopped virtue-signaling their support for open borders.

Instead, soon they went berserk over the influx.

So now an embarrassed Biden administration still wishes illegal aliens to keep coming but to stay far away from their advocates—by forcing them to remain in Texas.

That means the president has redefined the US. border. It rests now apparently north of Texas, as Biden cedes sovereignty to Mexico.

Precivilizational greens in California prefer blowing up dams to building them.

They couldn’t care less that their targeted reservoirs help store water in drought, prevent flooding, enhance irrigation, offer recreation, and generate clean hydroelectric power.

Now an absurd green California is currently destroying four dams on the Klamath River. In adding insult to injury, it is paying the half-billion dollar demolition cost in part through a water bond that state voters once thought would build new—not explode existing—dams.

The Biden administration is mandating new dates when electric vehicles will be all but mandatory.

To prove their current viability, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm led a performance art EV caravan on a long road trip.

When she found insufficient charging stations to continue her media stunt, she sent a gas-powered car ahead to block open charging stations and deny them to other EVs ahead in line.

Only that way could Granholm ensure that her arriving energy-starved motorcade might find rare empty charger stalls.

In some California charging stations, diesel generators are needed to produce enough “clean” electricity to power the stalls.

The state has steadily dismantled many of its nuclear, oil, and coal power plants. It refuses to build new natural gas generation plants.

Naturally, California’s heavily subsidized solar and wind plants now produce too much energy during the day and almost nothing at night.

So the state now begs residents to charge their EVs only during the day. Then at night, Californians may soon be asked to plug them in again to transfer what is left in their batteries into the state grid.

Apparently only that way will there be enough expropriated “green” electricity for 41 million state residents after dark.

One of the loudest leftist voices to defund the police, and decriminalize violent crimes in the post-George Floyd era, was Shivanthi Sathanandan, the 2nd Vice Chairwoman of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party.

She was recently not shy about defunding: “We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. Say it with me. DISMANTLE.”

But recently the loud Sathanandan was a victim of the very crime wave she helped to spawn.

Four armed thugs carjacked her automobile. They beat her up in front of her children at her own home, and sped off without fear of arrest.

The reaction of the arch police dismantler and decriminalizer on her road to Damascus?

The now bruised and bleeding activist for the first time became livid that criminals had taken over her Minneapolis: “Look at my face. REMEMBER ME when you are thinking about supporting letting juveniles and young people out of custody to roam our streets instead of HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.”

Andrea Smith was an ethnic studies professor  at the University of California, Riverside. But now she has been forced out after getting caught lying that she was Native American.

Prior to her outing, she was well known for damning “white women” (like herself) who opted to “become Indians” out of guilt, and (like her) for careerist advantage.

The common theme of these absurdities is how contrary to human nature, impractical, and destructive is utopian wokism, whether in matters of energy, race, crime, or illegal immigration.

There are two other characteristics of the Woke Revolution.

One, it depends solely on its advocates never having to experience firsthand any of the nonsense they inflict on others.

And two, dangerous zealots with titles before, and letters after, their names prove to be quite stupid—and dangerous.

Sunday, September 10, 2023

The 'Climate Emergency' Is a Hoax

 


The 'Climate Emergency' Is a Hoax

Robert Williams, Gatestone Institute

More than 1,600 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, have signed a declaration saying that "There is no climate emergency." The declaration is unlikely to get any attention from the mainstream media, unfortunately, but it is important for people to know about: the mass climate hysteria and the destruction of the US economy in the name of climate change need to stop.

"Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific," states the declaration signed by the 1,609 scientists, including Nobel laureates John F. Clauser from the US and Ivar Giaever from Norway/US.

"Climate policy relies on inadequate models

Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They... ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial... There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent." — 1,609 scientists, There is no Climate Emergency, clintel.org.

"I was taught that you tell the whole truth [as a scientist]...." Koonin said. He noted as well the immorality of asking the developing world to cut down emissions, when so many do not even have access to electricity and the immorality of scaring the younger generations.... — Steven E. Koonin, former Undersecretary for Science at the U.S. Department of Energy; current professor at New York University, fellow at the Hoover Institution, and author of Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters. — Hoover Institution, August 15, 2023.

Of course it would be helpful to research what can be done to relieve the problems brought about by man, such as the "hole in the ozone layer," which is now closing, but climate change is not an apocalyptic emergency and needs to be attended to without bringing devastation to the hundreds of millions of people already in extreme poverty.

The Biden administration, however, appears not to be concerned about the widespread poverty and massive starvation that will be caused by the unavailability of cheap and reliable energy in underdeveloped countries, or the inflation caused by the skyrocketing prices that are crushing Americans "barely able to afford one meal a day".

These are man-made problems, created by importing expensive (nearing $100 a barrel again) -- often dirtier -- oil from adversaries of the United States, such as Russia and Venezuela, instead of extracting it far less expensively at home.

The Biden administration also does not seem concerned that it is killing wildlife, sea life and the fishing industry by installing offshore wind turbines along the Atlantic seaboard, or that mandating electric vehicles will throw virtually the entire auto maintenance industry out of work (EVs do not need routine maintenance), or that lithium batteries not only explode but cost thousands of dollars to replace. The administration even wants military equipment, such as tanks, to be electric, as if there were charging stations in the middle of foreign deserts in the event of a conflict. Moreover, according to NBC News, volcanoes, unimpressed with executive orders, "Dwarf Humans for CO2 Emissions."

The Biden administration does not even bother to act on its own climate findings: In March, the White House released a report about the impact of climate change on the US economy. "Its findings undermine any claims of an ongoing climate crisis or imminent catastrophe" Koonin wrote in July. "The report's authors should be commended for honestly delivering likely unwelcome messages.... Exaggerating the magnitude, urgency and certainty of the climate threat encourages ill-considered policies that could be more disruptive and expensive than any change in the climate itself." — Steven E. Koonin, Wall Street Journal, July 6, 2023.

Never mind that much of climate change is apparently caused by sun flares, about which we can do nothing, and which, unlike commercial industries, do not offer grants; or that major wildfires are, ironically, exacerbated by "environmentalists" for refusing to let tinderbox brush be cleared lest the creatures there be disturbed other than by a wildfire.

Climate expert Bjørn Lomborg suggests that the trillions of dollars needed to address climate change might be put to better use:

"This isn't an argument to do nothing but just to be smarter. To ensure we can transition from fossil fuels, we need to ramp up research and development to innovate down the price of green energy. We should invest across all options including fusion, fission, storage, biofuel and other sources."

"Only when green energy is cheaper than fossil fuels will the world be able and willing to make the transition. Otherwise, today's energy prices are just a taste of things to come."

Wednesday, September 06, 2023

Soros Foundation Worries Trump Will Win in 2024

 


Soros Foundation Worries Trump Will Win in 2024

and undermine 'Imperil' Globalism (Communism)

Tom Ozimek, The Epoch Times

George Soros's foundation is worried that former President Donald Trump will win the 2024 election and undermine globalist "unity," while warning of supposed harms coming from a potential "MAGA-style Republican victory" more generally.

The Open Society Foundations (OSF), which Mr. Soros' 37-year-old son, Alex Soros now leads, is "adapting" so that it's able to respond to whatever political scenario emerges after the dust settles from next year's presidential election in America.

"We are adapting OSF to be able to respond to whatever scenarios might emerge, on both sides of the Atlantic," George Soros' son wrote in a recent op-ed for Politico headlined "No Soros retreat from Europe."

The op-ed came in response to news headlines claiming that the Soros foundation was "retreating" from Europe as part of a new "strategic direction" under new leadership.

In it, Mr. Alex Soros (self-avowedly "more political" than his father) clarified that the rumored exit is nothing of the sort—or not exactly. He characterized the change as a shift in priorities towards Eastern Europe that would involve a retrenchment of some operations, including "significantly" reducing headcount.

However, the younger Mr. Soros also used the opportunity of the op-ed to express his views on American politics—and fret about the prospect of a Trump victory.

Trump Win to Endanger 'Unity'?

Mr. Soros worries that a victory by President Trump—or another "MAGA-style" candidate—would endanger European unity and deliver a blow to the globalist agenda.

"Former United States President Donald Trump—or at least someone with his isolationist and anti-European policies—will be the Republican nominee," he predicted, adding that he believes that "a MAGA-style Republican victory in next year’s U.S. presidential election could, in the end, be worse for the EU than for the U.S."

Mr. Soros described the threat of a Trump or a "MAGA-style" Republican win in 2024 as an outcome that "will imperil European unity and undermine the progress achieved on so many fronts in response to the war in Ukraine."

While he didn't elaborate further on how a Trump win would endanger European unity or lead to undesirable outcomes in regards to Ukraine, there has been speculation that President Trump would push for a peace deal that would force Ukraine to accept some territorial concessions.

President Trump has pledged that he can end the Ukraine war within 24 hours of taking office, while refusing to say which side he wants to win.

“When I’m president, I will have that war settled in one day, 24 hours,” President Trump said during a CNN town hall in mid May, adding that he would meet with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin and pressure them to make a deal.

“They both have weaknesses and they both have strengths, and within 24 hours that war will be settled, it’ll be over,” President Trump said at the town hall.

In an interview on Fox News around the same time, President Trump provided more details on how he would persuade both sides to lay down arms and accept a peace settlement.

“I would tell Zelensky, no more. You got to make a deal. I would tell Putin, if you don't make a deal, we're going to give him a lot. We're going to [give Ukraine] more than they ever got if we have to,” President Trump said, adding that “he will have the deal done in one day.”

Polls show that support for the Ukraine war among the American public has waned, with a recent CNN-SSRS poll (pdf) released on Aug. 4 showing that a majority (51 percent) said the United States has done enough.

The United States has been a leading provider of security assistance to Ukraine, with the U.S. State Department saying on Aug. 22 that U.S. military aid and training to Ukraine amounts to nearly $46 billion since 2014, with $43.1 billion of that since Russia launched its invasion in February 2022.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment for this story from The Epoch Times.

'This Isn't Any Kind of a Retreat'

Mr. Soros' op-ed came amid a spate of news headlines that said OSF was pulling the plug on its European operations.

Quoting from an internal OSF email to staff in July, The Guardian reported that the new directional shift for the organization "provides for withdrawal and termination of large parts of our current work within the European Union, shifting our focus and allocation of resources to other parts of the world."

The Guardian report framed the strategic shift as a "retreat from Europe" that could "turn off the lights for human rights," while Bloomberg ran a headline that said "Soros Retreats as Right Wing Gains In Europe."

But Mr. Soros explained that, as OSF "retools how it works globally," the foundation is shifting its priorities in Europe but "this isn't any kind of a retreat."

"Yes, this means we will be exiting some areas of work as we focus on today’s challenges, as well as those we will face tomorrow. And yes, we will also be reducing our headcount significantly, seeking to ensure more money goes out to where it’s most needed," Mr. Soros wrote.

However, despite cutting jobs and rejigging money flows, Mr. Soros said that OSF would continue to support its affiliates in Moldova and the Western Balkans, and that "there should be absolutely no doubt that we will continue to support our foundation in Ukraine."

He also said that OSF would "dramatically" increase its support for some 12 million Roma, most of whom live in Eastern Europe, in their efforts to "secure equal treatment."

Around 40 percent of OSF's global staff will be cut as part of the strategic shift, per the July email cited by The Guardian.

The Democrat megadonor told the Wall Street Journal at the time that he initially didn't want to cede control of the foundation to any member of his family "as a matter of principle."

However, he said that he and his son "think alike" and that he's taking over at the helm of the foundation because "he's earned it."

At the time, Alex Soros told the outlet that he's "more political" than his father and that he's worried about the prospect of a Trump win in 2024.

“As much as I would love to get money out of politics, as long as the other side is doing it, we will have to do it, too,” he told the Journal, suggesting that the deep pockets of the Soros organization will be deployed to support presidential campaigns opposing President Trump.

Alex Soros was elected to the OSF board as its chairman in December 2022.


Tom Ozimek is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times. He has a broad background in journalism, deposit insurance, marketing and communications, and adult education.