Thursday, January 16, 2025

DRONE WARFARE BASICS

DRONE WARFARE BASICS

Mike Walker, Col USMC (ret)

OVERVIEW:

Drone Warfare in the Russo-Ukraine War has jumpstarted a new Revolution in Military Affairs.

I write with confidence that one thousand US Marines with ten thousand drones and appropriate logistical support can single-handedly defeat one-on-one the large majority of the world’s militaries.

It is a stunning turn of events as we stare deeply at new battlefields which are changing faster than onlookers can keep up. It truly is dizzying in it advances.

The changes also are incredibly dynamic. It is not simply a matter of fielding new and better drones – which is indeed happening. But simply upgrading software or electronics or avionics or batteries or sensors or payload or any combination on existing tactical drones, allows the old weapons to be reinvented – to make an immediate quantum leap in battlefield lethality.

And just to pile on, the emerging power of AI in drone warfare is just beginning to be felt and it too looks to be game-changing.

What to do? To lay a foundation we will take a snapshot mostly centered on United States drone capabilities. Hopefully that will get you into the game but remember, at best this discussion will only enable you to ask better questions.


MISSIONS:  

Combat

Surveillance- Reconnaissance

Logistical

Covert/Clandestine Intelligence

Subsurface

Anti-Drone Defenses

 

Combat

Strategic-Operational Level

MQ-20 Avenger (Predator C) – King of the Combat Drones 

Speed: 400/460mph (cruise/max speed)       Endurance: 18 hours

Range: +15,000 miles (aerial refueling)

Payload: 3,500lbs with internal weapons bay and up to six (6) external hardpoints carrying precision guided munitions (from 250 to 2,000 lbs)

Extra: Uses stealth and reduced signature technology

MQ-9 Reaper (Predator B) – Hunter-Killer UAV

Tactical Level

Switchblade Loitering Attack [Kamikaze] Munition (AKA Low-altitude Stalking & Strike Ordnance/LASSO)

    Model 300 antipersonnel

Speed: 100mph           Endurance: 10-20 minutes

Range: 15 miles 

Payload: 40mm grenade 5m casualty radius

Extra: Uses stealth and reduced signature technology

    Model 600 antitank

Speed: 400/460mph   Endurance: 18 hours

Range: +15,000 miles 

Payload: 3,500lbs with internal weapons bay and up to six (6) external hardpoints carrying precision guided munitions (from 250 to 2,000 lbs)

Extra: Uses stealth and reduced signature technology

Endnote 

The major on-going evolution in tactical combat drones is the transition from human-guided kamikaze drones to fully robotic killer drones that reduces and ideally will eliminate the need for trained and skilled drone operators.

But drones are not perfect. They can malfunction and – like any airborne platform – suffer from the vagaries of the environment. Wind, rain, snow, mist and fog effect drones. Operation at night is challenging and terrain can matter. Urban areas present obstacles to drone flight, triple-canopy jungle can be impenetrable, and flying inside wooded areas a nightmare.

 

Surveillance-Reconnaissance 

Tactical Level

RQ-7 Shadow

Speed: 81/130mph 

Endurance: 7.5 hours

Range: 70 miles 

Payload: Stabilized electro-optical/infrared tracking cameras

Logistical

When it comes to logistical drones, payload is everything. And by everything we mean small. Logistical resupply by drone at this time is limited by payload to urgently needed supplies in small amounts. That means either some uniquely critical item(s) or more generally, support for small teams in the reconnaissance-intelligence gathering/ unconventional warfare/special operations realm.

Covert/Clandestine Intelligence

In addition to military surveillance and reconnaissance missions, a whole host of drones are specifically designed for intelligence gathering and to achieve their mission, many of these are extremely small. So small that the next generation of clandestine operators might will be AI-driven drones that pass as horse flies.

Subsurface (Unmanned Undersea Vehicles or UUVs)    

Subsurface drones have been around a long time but many were limited by cable connections. That is no longer an issue as you will note below.

Ghost Shark (Australia)

Herne (UK) Payload: surveillance/reconnaissance sensors

Endurance:  3 days 

(working on a next-generation 45-day endurance/3,000-mile cruising range version)

Manta Ray (US) 

Long endurance and range as it can both swim and hibernate for extended periods on the sea floor.

Wide range of missions with classified hunter-killer capabilities

Marichka (Ukraine) Payload: “kamikaze” combat/attack munition

Orca (US Extra Large UUV (XLUUV))

In essence, an unmanned conventional submarine with hunter-killer, minelaying, and reconnaissance-surveillance-intelligence gathering missions

Endurance: Months

Cruising Range: 7,500 miles (nearing the capability of World War II U-boats)

                        

Anti-Drone Defense

For now, detection and RF jamming remain the primary components of anti-drone defenses. Tactically, the Marine Corps is fielding a portable Anti-Drone System that uses RF detection and audio sensors that cross reference a changeable library. Ideally future libraries can be updated/improved using AI to work with limited data and Id the target. The Marine operator wears a “touch” haptic device on his body (akin to a smart phone vibrator) to discretely alert the Marine. That at provides critical warning time to take cover and disperse.

At that point, integrated Radio Frequency (RF) jamming (broadband, spot, and barrage) takes over. Unsurprisingly, there is a full range of pretty effective off-the-shelf drone jammers ranging in price from $2,000 to $18,000 (and some really impressive stuff if you have deep pockets).

Therein lies the rub. To counter the detection-jamming defenses, the drone radio networks are employing smart frequency hopping technology to avoid jammers. That makes them even harder to find and attack and another counter-drone hurdle is IFF. Identify-Friend-or-Foe systems prevent friendly fire but there is nothing out there even remotely similar to the highly effective IFF systems used in conventional air war operations. Finally, under current conditions with its overcrowded frequency bands, autonomous jammers are as likely to jam friend as foe. Finally, drones are employing vastly more capable microprocessors and expanded data storage. As a result, drone flight control is getting away from jammable GPS (an advanced throwback to terrain navigating systems developed in the 1980s).

Then there is the future. A tactical counter-drone idea being explored is to deploy swarms of loitering “hornets” that will seek out and kill hapless drones before they become a threat.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped this short treatise has given both a useful overview of drone warfare and blunt insight into its complexities. Most of all, it should shock you into understanding that 21st century warfare is changing dramatically and if you think you have mastered it then you don’t understand it at all. But if you think this is something you MUST get smarter about then you are on the right course.

 

Sunday, January 12, 2025

Gavin Newsom has failed California

 

 Gavin Newsom has failed California

How Gavin Newsom has failed California and set fire to his own political prospects

Kirsten Fleming, New York Post 

The emperor has no clothes — and no empathy.

It’s likely, though, he still does have a standing reservation at the French Laundry.

Of course, it’s Gavin Newsom, of whom I write.

The smug and ambitious progressive California Governor whose political aspirations went up in flames as Los Angeles continues to burn to the ground, leaving a shocking number of residents’ lives in tatters.

And it’s Newsom, who has become the arsonist, setting the fire to his political fortunes with a series of unforced errors — putting a cap on years of mismanagement and abandoning crucial infrastructure in favor of useless far left policies that made social justice and climate warriors feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Since the inferno broke out, Newsom has shown that he’s ill prepared and shameless: shifting blame to others and trying to ditch one of his devastated constituents.

It’s like he and the epically feckless Karen “I’d rather be in Ghana” Bass had made a political suicide pact for 2025.

As Pacific Palisades was ablaze, Anderson Cooper asked Newsom about the dry hydrant situation there. Instead of owning any failure, he passed the buck.

“Look, the local folks are trying to figure that out,” he told Cooper.

Actually, Gov., you should have ensured the local folks had it sorted as risks were well known.

This all stops with the top, even if it was a “local” issue. This apocalyptic inferno wasn’t some freak accident in a backwater that no one could find on the map. This was Los Angeles, home to millions, and a city that remains under constant threat of wildfires.

Then he cowardly tried to use a fake phone connection to brush off an anguished mother sifting through the rubble of her community.

“Governor! Governor! I live here, Governor! That was my daughter’s school!” said Pacific Palisades resident Rachel Dervish, running after Newsom as he tried to hightail it back into his SUV.

“I’m literally talking to the president right now to specifically answer the question, of what we can do for you and your daughter,” he said with all the blessed chutzpah of Jan Brady speaking on the phone with George Glass.

When Dervish asked to hear the call, “because I don’t believe it,” Newsom, who was clearly not on a line with anyone, then switched tactics. He said he was trying to get ol’ Joe on the horn but he had no service. He explained that he had tried five times and was walking around looking for a signal.

She continued to press him on the lack of water in the hydrants.

“Why was there no water in the hydrants, Governor? Is it going to be different next time?” she asked.

“It has to be, it has to be, of course,” he said when she told him he was doing nothing.

She was desperate and grief stricken. She was also – like so many in her neighborhood – angry.

There were red flag warnings and yet, Bass was in Africa and Newsom was out to lunch. Why wasn’t he micromanaging their preparedness and their water supply.

Natural disasters are a fact of life in the Golden State and it’s impossible to guess mother nature – but there are also ways to prepare for battle and mitigate the damage from her wrath.

Take Ron DeSantis, who every year is faced with a destructive hurricane season. He is an extremely competent crisis manager who prepares for the worst, marshals all resources and communicates extremely effectively with Floridians.

He seems to revel in the details, in the foresight and in the aftermath, helping residents return to normalcy as soon as possible.

The act of governing is not sexy. Just look at the Florida Governor’s terribly unflattering white rain boots. Karl Lagerfeld he is not.

Newsom, on the other hand, is slick and handsome. But he is empty and incompetent. He is skilled in delivering platitudes about diversity and inclusion, hyper-focusing on “marginalized communities,” including the endangered Delta smelt, according to Trump.

And for all his talk about tolerance, he was cold and dismissive to Dervish. Sometimes being a leader means listening and being a soft place to land. Expressing both confidence and humanity.

It’s what George W. Bush understood when he stood on the pile at Ground Zero and said, “I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you.”

Newsom, who was very high in the dem’s presidential depth chart, spectacularly failed this moment on both a political and a human level.

Voters will not forget.

 

Monday, December 30, 2024

Merrick Garland's Corruption

 

Merrick Garland corrupted the Justice Department

with political persecutions

Glenn H. Reynolds, New York Post  

As what’s left of the Biden administration winds down, I’d like to offer an end-of-days reminder: Joe Biden wasn’t just a terrible president. 

His Attorney General Merrick Garland was an equally terrible leader of the Department of Justice.

Garland, you may recall, was nominated for the Supreme Court by President Barack Obama to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died suddenly a few months before the 2016 election. 

Republicans sat on Garland’s nomination, maintaining that the seat should be filled by a new president.

We were told that this was hideously unfair and partisan, especially because, as the Obama administration and its friendly media repeatedly assured us, Garland was a moderate, a nonpartisan straight shooter, a person with a first-rate judicial temperament: honest, just, fair and wise.

What a crock that was.

Garland didn’t get the seat, which wound up being filled by Neil Gorsuch.  Four years later, when Joe Biden came into the Oval Office after Donald Trump’s (first) term, he nominated Garland to be his attorney general. 

Consolation prize? Perhaps.

But Garland went on to spend his entire time as AG demonstrating to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear that he is anything but honest, just, fair and wise.

Let me be clear (to use an Obama phrase): Garland has been a dishonest, unfair, partisan hack.  And none too wise, either.

As Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) told the AG in hearings about the FBI’s war on political opponents, “Thank God you are not on the Supreme Court.”

Those hearings involved Garland’s inexplicable decision to hurl federal law-enforcement resources at parents who spoke against critical race theory and unpopular transgender policies at school-board meetings.

In response to a letter from the left-leaning National School Boards Association, which described those meetings with lurid language but scant evidence of any real threats, Garland ordered the FBI and the Department of Justice into action against these “domestic terror” threats.

It turned out the Biden White House was talking to the National School Boards Association about the matter before its letter was even sent, the Washington Free Beacon reported, raising questions of collusion between the administration and outside “activists.”

The FBI also infiltrated traditional Catholic congregations — all while leftist groups were promoting riots and terror in cities across America, unhindered by the feds. 

Garland’s Justice Department showed less pity to grandmas praying outside of abortion clinics than to actual domestic terrorists who were inciting riots and trying to burn federal buildings.

Biden’s AG has also presided over the absurd “lawfare” prosecutions of Trump. He approved the FBI SWAT raid on Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago, where agents pawed through Melania’s underwear and left bogus classified-document covers lying around so as to produce photos that gave the false impression that Trump had, well, left classified documents lying around.

To add to the outrage, special prosecutor Jack Smith, who Garland sicced on Trump for allegedly mishandling classified documents, had to admit to the court that his office had . . . mishandled those very classified documents, mixing them up in ways that disadvantaged Trump’s defense lawyers, then falsely representing that the documents were exactly as they had been received.

Garland prosecuted former Trump official Peter Navarro and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon for contempt of Congress, sending both to jail for months 

But when Garland himself was held in contempt of Congress, he did not, surprisingly, bring charges against himself, or appoint a special prosecutor to objectively investigate.

Garland was charged with ignoring a congressional subpoena regarding its probe of Biden family business dealings. 

Hey, ignoring a congressional subpoena is what he jailed Navarro and Bannon for! That doesn’t sound very judicious or fair.

Well, no surprise. Garland just followed the lead of Obama’s attorney general and “wingman,” Eric Holder, who also let himself off the hook when charged with contempt of Congress.

In a bid to polish up Biden’s rusted image, The Washington Post on Sunday reported on the president’s private complaints that Garland should have been faster to prosecute Trump, so that he could have staged a “politically damaging trial before the election.”

Funny, as I recall Trump had a lot of trials before the election — and they all seemed to drive his approval levels up, not down. 

In any case, this seems like an admission, as law professor Ann Althouse observed, that “Biden intended to use the Justice Department to destroy his political adversary!”

Indeed. That now seems to have been Garland’s role throughout this administration, which — in the name of “protecting democracy” and our institutions — has only undermined our democracy and corrupted our institutions.

That’s Biden’s sorry legacy. And Merrick Garland’s, too.


Glenn Harlan Reynolds is a professor of law at the University of Tennessee and founder of the InstaPundit.com blog.

Thursday, December 19, 2024

Palestine: What’s in a Name?

 

Thought that ‘tis the season to send this out before some other half-baked cleric restarts the “Christ was a Palestinian” nonsense.

 

Palestine: What’s in a Name?

Mike Walker, Col USMC (ret)

 

One thing you see a lot of by the current generation of left-leaning and often hard-left history professors is the word “Palestine.” The reasons are many but almost always based on leftist ideologies and causes.

 

Which is why these historians are loath to use the words Canaan or Judah or Judea or Israel or – God forbid – the Holy Land during the Crusader Era. And they never ever use the ancient name Zion. Instead, the word Palestine (and ideally only Palestine) is inserted as often as possible.

 

Why?

 

Sadly, they aim to trick their audience into believing there was and always has been a land called Palestine. Further, their current goal is to delegitimize the state of Israel by supplanting its history with a misleading and often false narrative.

 

Here is the truth: the word “Palestine” is a European invention for the region that began with Alexander the Great’s conquests, then adopted under the Romans, and lastly when the British took over at the end of World War I. Beyond those European periods of conquest, going back over 3,000 years, the region was never called Palestine.

 

Significantly, during Islamic rule, the Greco-Roman word “Palestine” (in any of its forms) never was used.

 

And unsurprisingly, the longest and most enduring titles of the Jewish homeland were Hebrew or Hebrew adaptations centered on the names Zion, Israel and Judea.

 

So how about some history?

 

Perhaps the earliest form of the word Palestine begins some 3,000 years ago in ancient Egypt, around 1150 BCE, with P-R-S-T or Peleset used to describe what we call Philistines. And the Assyrians also made reference the Pilitsti or Palatsu.

 

The first Philistines were a Greco-Aegean people who settled Philistia along a coastal strip centered on modern Gaza City (and possibly related to the late-Bronze Age Sea Peoples). The city states stretched roughly 60 km along the Mediterranean and were about 15 km in width totaling roughly 900 km2 in area.

 

The Philistines never ruled the region, only that enclave and for reference, modern Israel is about 21,000 km2 in size or over 20 times larger than ancient Philistia.

 

That was a long time ago but not quite as old as the Egyptian root word for Israel (Khabiri) dating to 1209 BCE (although some claim the Egyptians referred to Israel a few decades earlier during the reign of Rameses II). The Assyrians called them Hibaru (Hebrews) and later, in the 9th century BCE, the Bit Omri (after the name of the sixth Jewish ruler of Israel, King Omri).

 

Either way, the Jewish people resided in much of what is present-day Israel and for much of this era the region often was divided into two kingdoms: Israel (and sometimes Samaria) in the north and Judah in the south.

 

These two peoples, the Philistines and Israelites, cohabited the region and were fierce rivals (think David versus Goliath about a decade or two before 1,000 BCE). By the way, David ruled the united kingdom of Israel and Judea (accomplished by his predecessor, King Saul).

 

Several centuries later, in the 7th century BCE, the Babylonians crushed both the Jews and Philistines. They renamed the region Yehud, a Hebrew word for Jews.

 

The Philistines never recovered and their lands came under the control of Egypt (which would be conquered by Persia in the next century). But they were not entirely forgotten, in the 5th century BCE, the Greek historian Herodotus recalled them as what he called the Palaistine and Europeans thereafter associated the region with that name.

 

The Jews faced a happier fate. They were able to return after six decades of captivity in Assyria.

 

This is where Zionism comes from: The effort to reestablish their homeland by Jews who were forcibly expelled. It was the Persians who made the return to Zion possible and the Jewish lands willingly became the Persian province of Yehud Medinata (Mount Zion was the landmark hill of ancient Jerusalem).

 

Internally, the north became Samaria (peopled by Jews but also a small Jewish sect, the Samaritans, who limited the sacred texts to the Torah or Pentateuch) and the south again became Judea. Divisions again ran deep as the Samaritans were deemed sinful outcasts by Judea (hence the shock of finding a “good” Samaritan in the Bible).

 

Judea came to dominate the region and this ushered in the Second Temple era which lasted for a bit over 200 years until a youthful Greek King of Macedonia named Alexander came calling with his massive army in tow. The Persians fought back but it was a losing proposition. Alexander took control in 332 BCE (to include Egypt, where a new city was built: Alexandria).

 

The Greeks, under the dynastic rule of the Ptolemy family (founded by one of Alexander’s ablest generals) ruled the entire region – to include the Jewish states – from their capital of Alexandria for the next 130 years or so.

 

Ptolemy gave the Jewish homeland the old Greek name of Palaistine and it became the front line in the wars against the resurgent Persian Seleucid Empire (ruled by another Greek dynasty founded by another of Alexander’s generals, Seleucus).

 

In 201 BCE, the Seleucids captured Palaistine and it again became Judea. The Seleucids at first ruled with a light hand but the brutal rein of Antiochus IV beginning in 170 BCE led to armed rebellion in Judea (led by the Maccabees). The Jewish people prevailed with independence regained in 167 BCE.

 

The Jewish world at this time was not limited to Israel-Judea. To the south, Jewish Edom (Greek Idoumaia, Roman Idumea) was ruled by the Herod family whose members intermarried with the ruling families of Judea. There also were sizeable Jewish communities in major ports of the eastern Mediterranean and tens of thousands of Jews lived in Alexandria.

 

But it did not stop there. There were Jewish communities all along Arabian coast of the Red Sea as far south as present-day Yemen and even along the African Red Sea coast. But all the regional states, to include the Jews, were about to face their strongest foe, the Romans.

 

The Romans dramatically arrived in the last century before Christ under the leadership of Julius Caesar. Perhaps his most famous exploit dealt with Egypt where he brought the Ptolemaic ruler, the famed Cleopatra, into the Roman fold.

 

(As another aside, Cleopatra is not an Egyptian word. It is Greek, a name often used by women from the Macedonian aristocracy).

 

The Romans then advanced further east and in 63 BCE King Herod the Great in Jerusalem (and kin of the Herods of Edom) agreed to vassalage under Rome. That sustained the continued if conditional independence of Judea.

 

After Caesar’s assassination in 44 BCE, Rome was plunged into a civil war and Cleopatra backed Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony). It was the wrong side and both were dead by 30 BCE.

 

Which leads us to Christmas.

 

At the time of Christ's birth, Judea was ruled by Herod Archelaus, a Jew and son of King Herod the Great.

 

Thus Christ was born a Jew in the Jewish Kingdom of Judea which remained a Roman vassal, only now under Emperor Caesar Augustus.

 

Herod Archelaus, however, proved a poor leader and in 6 BCE, when Christ was a child, Augustus dethroned him and made Judea a province of Rome.

 

Things went along somewhat smoothly until the reign of Emperor Nero, a particularly nasty despot (even accounting for modern revisionist arguments that make him slightly less profligate).

 

Predictably, Nero’s governor in Judea managed to so alienate the Jewish population with his excesses that in 65 CE they rose up in rebellion – a rebellion that did not end until 74 CE.

 

It was a costly war for Rome. Judea had been calm and there was no sizeable Roman garrison. To right things, the XII Legion in Syria was ordered to Judea. Unfortunately for Rome, it was crush and its few survivors disgraced after its imperial eagle (or aquila) was captured.

 

Nero then ordered the X and XV Legions under General Vespasian (who had distinguished himself during the conquest of Britain) to suppress the uprising. Vespasian arrived in 66 CE and met with great success in Galilee, so much that in 69 CE, Vespasian became emperor following Nero’s suicide. He then sent General Titus (also a future emperor) to Judea and doubled his army by adding the V and VII Legions.

 

In 70 CE, Titus razed much of Jerusalem, destroyed the Second Temple Mount, and ended the war in 73-74 CE with the siege of the mountain fortress at Masada by the X Legion. The Jewish garrison ultimately committed suicide rather than face certain defeat and capture. (In commemoration, Masada is where today’s Israeli military officers take their commissioning oaths).

 

As under the Greeks, there were large Jewish communities living in most of the Roman Empire’s southeastern Mediterranean provinces as well as Rome itself and the number of Jews displaced by the war in Judea only increased these regional populations.

 

That growing diaspora led to the next great Jewish uprising against Roman colonial oppression in 115 CE. The underlying causes were several. One was remaining unrest over Roman rule in general but the most import was timing, the Roman empire had committed its army in 113 CE in yet another of its wars with the Parthians (Persians), this one over control of Armenia.

 

As Trajan and his army began a long march on the Parthian capital of Ctesiphon (just south of modern Baghdad, Iraq), minor uprisings against the Romans in Cyrenaica (eastern Libya and home of Simon of Cyrene of the New Testament).

 

That spread to Egypt, Cyprus, and to Roman Mesopotamia. Almost everywhere diaspora Jews joined and often led the resistance and soon Judea became the heart of the uprising. Trajan called upon General Lusius Queitus to restore order and that gave the war its common name, the Kitos War.

 

Quetius was a Berber Roman officer who had fought well in Dacia (modern Romania), against the Parthians (Persians), and then crushed a pro-Parthian uprising in Babylon. So when the Jewish revolt arose, Trajan made him legate of Judea and ordered him to crush that rebellion.

 

After it was suppressed, Rome finally felt obliged to garrison Judea, stationing the VI Legion there on a permanent basis.

 

But peace did not last. By the 130s CE, Hadrian, who was born Publius Aelius Hadrianus, became emperor. Hadrian was strong, competent, and cautious emperor who defended the empire forcefully. Hadrian also was a noted builder of public works, and after visiting Judea in 130, he promised to rebuild Jerusalem to include the Second Temple.

 

But his actions more enraged than endeared. Hadrian did have Jerusalem, the capital of the Judea, rebuilt but renamed it after himself, Aelia Capitolina, and then began work to erect a statue of Jupiter on the ruins of the Temple Mount. To show Roman power, a second legion, the X, was sent to garrison Aelia Capitolina.

 

These insults and desecrations led to the 3rd Jewish-Roman War that began in 132. At the very onset of the uprising both legions took to the field and marched against the Jewish rebels but were stymied by strong resistance and suffered heavy casualties. Soon large parts of the Judean and Idumean regions were in rebel hands where they established a government and even issued currency stamped with the Temple Mount on one side of the coins and the slogan “Free Jerusalem” on the reverse.

 

Hadrian did not hesitate to respond and soon 4 more legions under Sextus Julius Severus made ready to battle in Judea with more alerted. Despite the early successes, the power of Rome inexorably ground down the Jewish resistance. By 136, after four years of war, Rome emerged victorious.

 

Hadrian, understandably, sought to ensure this third war with the Jews would be the last and took extreme measures. The name Judea (which dated backed many centuries) was erased, the province given a Romanized version of the old Greek name, Palaestina. In Jerusalem, Jews were expelled and banned from even reentering the city. The survivors who fought against Rome were enslaved and the rebellious communities ethnically cleansed and exiled to Galilee.

 

Their homes, farms, and pasture lands were forfeited and new settler-colonists were brought into the Jewish lands. They primarily were loyal ethnic Greeks (who populated much of the eastern Mediterranean coastal world of that age) and they came to be called Palestinians.

 

Whatever else it produced, it brought Pax Romana to the region. Then the Roman Empire divided late in the 3rd century and became Christian very early in the 4th century. Palaestina, which had a Christian population since the time of Christ in the 1st century, also became predominantly Christian and remained part of the Roman Empire. After Rome fell in 476 CE, only the Eastern Roman Empire remained to include the Christian-dominated Palaestina and so things stood for the next century and a half.

 

And again as noted above, they too would lose their almost all their lands following the Moslem Conquest in the 630s. That was when another onslaught of settler-colonists took control of everything: the Arabs. (Although many Jews and descendants of the original Christian Palestinians remain in the Holy Land to this day).

 

The land was again divided in two and formed into military districts (junds): Jund al Urdunn in the north and Jund Filastin in the south, a clear reference to the Philistines. That is how things stood until the Abbasid Caliphate redistricted and incorporated the entire region into Bilad al Sham around 750 AD.

 

And that is where today’s ISIS and HTS gets part of their names: The Islamic State of Iraq and Sham and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.

 

In 970, the Fatimid Shite Muslims ruling from Cairo conquered Jerusalem and wrested control of the area away from the Abbasid. The tumult continued.

 

By the 11th century the Seljuk (Seljuq) Turks from south central Asia were displacing both the Abbasid and Fatimids (whom they deemed apostates) and the region was roiled anew with their capture of Jerusalem in 1071. They called the region Safad and al Karak but had just begun to establish their rule when the Europeans reentered the arena.

 

Just 25 years later, in 1096, the First Crusade began. The causes were many but the region's chaotic state was key as Christian Holy Land pilgrims had become targets of both organized raiders and thieves as well as violent Islamic fanatics. That led to Pope Urban II’s call for knights to defend the pilgrims and secure Christianity’s most sacred sites.

 

It was smashing success for the Christians. Jerusalem fell in 1099 and soon the entire region was under their control through various Crusader or Outremer (Far Sea) States ranging from modern-day southeastern Turkey down to coastal Syria, Lebanon, Israel and Gaza. From north to south they were County of Edessa, the Principality of Antioch, the County of Tripoli, and the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

 

Opposing them were the Fatimids from the south, the Emirate of Damascus from the east and the Seljuk Empire from the north and northeast. It ushered in two centuries of conflict.

 

Then came the Mongols in 1258. When they were through, the great political, economic, academic, and cultural center of Baghdad virtually was erased. Never again would that corner of the world host the capital of one of the world’s great powers.

 

But the Mongols were not invincible. Islam always embraced slavery on a massive scale and that extended to the military in the form of slave-soldiers. These solders, who came primarily from Transoxiana in central Asia, were called Mamluk (meaning “one who is owned”).

 

Realizing their latent power, the Mamluk knights rose up, seized power in Egypt, and in 1250 established a Sultanate that expanded into the Holy Land to face the Crusaders.

 

In 1260, they took on and beat the Mongols at the Battle of Ain Jalut in Galilee thus preserving their sultanate. In 1291, the Mamluks expelled the last of the Crusaders at Acre. But a lesson had been learned. Going forward, the Muslim Mamluks safeguarded Christians, their holy sites, and Christian pilgrimages to the Holy Land. There were no new crusades.

 

The Mamluk Sultanate retained the provincial organization of the Seljuks, maintaining Safad in the north and al-Karak in the south. They would remain in command of the area until the arrival of the Ottoman Turks in the 16th century.

 

So impressive was the legacy of the Mamluk warriors that to this day, United States Marine Corps officers carry Mamluk swords during formal dress ceremonies.

 

In 1517, the Ottomans took power and the region became the Eyalet of Damascus (the Ottomans named provinces for the capital city). The eyalet was divided into a number of sanjaks (districts) also name for governing cities and the Holy Land was divided between the Sanjaks of Beirut and Jerusalem.

 

In 19th century Europe and the associated empires, classical Greece and Rome were deeply revered by the educated ruling class and that led to a revival of the words Palaistine and Palaestina respectively for the Holy Land which were anglicized by English-speaking people into Palestine. 

 

This also led to great increase in Christian pilgrims which in turn raised the interest of European Christian religious leaders along with their monarchs. In reaction to the heightened political concerns, in 1841, the Sanjak of Jerusalem was separated from Damascus, reestablished as the Marasarrifate of Jerusalem, and ruled directly from the Porte. In 1871, it became a separate Eyalet.

 

Then came the First World War which the Ottoman Empire entered after naval battling with the Russians in October. In January 1915, two Ottoman armies invaded the Sinai threatening the Suez Canal. The British reacted strongly.

 

Soon, an Allied army dominated by British Commonwealth forces counterattacked. That first led to failed fighting in Gallipoli and more successful British support for the Arab Uprising against the Ottomans (made famous by the exploits of Lawrence of Arabia). The fighting shifted to Egypt and in January 1917, the Allies recaptured the Sinai and the fighting spread to the Holy Land. On 11 December, the Allies marched victoriously into Jerusalem.

 

Reflecting the significance of the event, British Prime Minister Lloyd George described it as a Christmas present to the British people.

 

Throughout this period the British referred to the region as Palestine. After victory in the world war, the peace negotiations at Versailles awarded those Ottoman lands to the British Empire which called it Palestine.

 

After three millennia of history, in the early 20th century and for the first time, the name Palestine became the universal word for the region.