Friday, February 25, 2022

A Serious Question for President Biden and Special Envoy Kerry

 


A Serious Question for President Biden and Special Envoy Kerry

open letter:


(1) the humanitarian atrocity in Ukraine perpetrated by Vladimir Putin must be resisted by all prudent means.

(2) No other major population block outside the United States is more committed to reducing green house gases than Free Europe.

(3) Russia MUST NOT gain economic advantage through the continued export of fossil fuels to Free Europe.

(4) In the short-term, Free Europe has vital needs for limited fossil fuels.

(5) In the short term the United States (and allied nations like Canada) can provide the vital fossil fuel needs for our friends and allies in Free Europe.

(6) The United States (and allied nations like Canada) can provide vital fossil fuels environmentally safer and cleaner than Russia.

(7) The only rational, moral, and ethical solution is to supplant Russian fossil fuel supplies with cleaner and safer North American fossil fuels.

Col Mike Walker, USMC (ret)

Putin's invasion, Biden's equivocation



Putin's invasion, Biden's equivocation

Putin is acting, and Biden is reacting… slowly.

James J. Carafano, Fox News 

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, which began in 2014, has resumed. Putin was not deterred. The threat of sanctions failed to stop Putin from launching a full-scale assault spanning the width and depth of Ukraine.

This wasn’t just a nibble to expand the territory Russia holds in the Donbas; missile and aircraft strikes took place all through the country. Russian paratroops were reported in the western port city of Odessa, and Russian tanks have been filmed roaring nearby the abandoned Chernobyl nuclear power plant.

Putin may not intend to take and hold all of Ukraine, but his newly stated objective—"the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine"—certainly bodes ill for Ukrainian independence and democracy. At the very least, Putin’s military objectives appear more significant than many had envisioned.

For example, early troop movements suggest that Putin seeks to establish a land bridge from Russia to Crimea. That would require Russian troops seizing and holding Donetsk. Russia earlier this week recognized Donetsk as being independent of Ukraine and Russian forces are on the move there. If successful, that advance would turn the Sea of Azov into a Russian lake and allow Moscow to control entry to the Volga-Don canal, which connects the Black Sea to the Caspian Sea.

Of course, all we can do at this stage is guess about Putin’s ultimate objectives. It may be that even Putin doesn’t know for sure how far he will drive west. Some of this answer rests on the Ukrainian military’s ability and willingness to fight.

The West has not been entirely passive. Putin’s actions have triggered the "maximalist" response threatened by NATO: sanctions, political solidarity in support of Ukraine, various kinds of assistance, and increased deployments of NATO assets to demonstrate a determination to safeguard NATO territory. The alliance has therefor demonstrated the resolve to do what it said it would. Yet clearly, those threatened actions were not enough to deter Putin.

Biden, too, has done what he threatened. But he continues to look like he is slow walking through the crisis. It took several hours for the administration even to clearly acknowledge that Ukraine had been "further" invaded. Biden’s clock seems to be running a day behind Putin’s.

Biden’s boosters claim that he is leading the West’s response. The Washington Post even rolled out an editorial claiming that Ukrainians are "lucky" this action didn’t occur on Trump’s watch. To make that argument, one must skip over the historical fact that Putin did nothing on Trump’s watch other than continue to skirmish along the line of contact that the Russian Duma has now officially, and illegally, erased.

Of course, historical comparisons don’t change the present or the future. What’s more important now is to look at the timeline and weight of our current president’s response. It has been underwhelming, to say the least. Biden has never pressed ahead of where, collectively, the allies were willing to go. That’s not leadership, that’s treating statecraft and military decision-making like a summer camp experience. Further, this is cold comfort for Ukrainians. They are the ones now facing the dogs of war.

Biden made an equal muddle at home. He never made a decisive case for defending America’s interests. Even today, most Americans don’t understand that the chief beneficiary of a Europe destabilized by an aggressive Putin is China. Checkmating Putin is a critical step in dealing with the China threat and that is crucially important to American security.

As we move into the next phase of this crisis, we know only two things. One: Putin is acting, and Biden is reacting… slowly. Two: It is still unclear how Biden intends to deal with this crisis, and we have no idea on how he will deal with the next one.

Putin’s ambitions don’t stop with Ukraine. If he is going to be checked, the United States and its allies have to build sufficient strategic and conventional deterrence to checkmate his military and enough energy independence and energy security to short-circuit his ability to weaponize oil and gas exports. Until Biden makes clear that he has a solid plan for accomplishing this, Americans and their allies will continue to question his desire and even his ability to lead.


James Jay Carafano is vice president of foreign and defense policy studies  The Heritage Foundation. Follow him on Twitter @JJCarafano.

Thursday, February 24, 2022

The Heroic People of Ukraine



The Heroic People of Ukraine

Col Mike Walker, USMC (retired)


In the coming days, the place in the history of Ukraine and of the Ukrainian people for the next 300 years will be written.

In the face of great odds, against a vile bloodthirsty dictator, and when having to stand virtually alone on the battlefield, Ukraine holds not just its immediate fate in its hands but what honor, justice, and courage mean to all people when faced by evil oppression in its cruelest form.

The people of Ukraine are not just fighting for their nation they are fighting for every person on this planet to cherish freedom and democracy.

What Ukraine does in this perilously dangerous here-and-now will change the history of the world.

Wednesday, February 23, 2022

What's next from Russia, Ukraine and the new Cold War?

 


What's next from Russia, Ukraine and the new Cold War?

Putin's land grab in Ukraine is a grim reminder of a new world order under Biden's watch

 Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis, (ret.), Foxnews 

"This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine," President Biden said on Tuesday in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's recognition of Ukraine’s two breakaway regions. Putin’s decision was quickly followed by the movement of thousands of Russian troops to the region to enforce that land grab, a sobering reminder of the emergent new world order.

Moscow’s invasion of eastern Ukraine is déjà vu 2008 with the Republic of Georgia [seizure of Abkhazia and South Ossetia] and Ukraine in 2014 [annexation of Crimea], and if I were in the Baltics [Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania] and the balance of Ukraine, or perhaps even Poland, I’d watch carefully movements to my east. Putin is poised to push west against the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to recover lost ground which he considers part of the historic Russian Empire.

Putin’s aggression should alarm westerners who naively cling to NATO’s prowess. Years ago, during the Cold War (1948-1991), the West was much stronger and more able to stand up against Soviet aggression but not so much now. I doubt anyone who truly understands NATO’s capabilities believes the alliance can really defeat the Russian army. The numbers just aren’t there anymore.

Meanwhile, Putin long ago planned to create the pretext to move against Ukraine’s east via misinformation about alleged atrocities. That’s been building now for weeks: hybrid warfare with psychological operations, cyberattacks, and cease-fire violations. Recently the evacuation of civilians into Russia was a clear indication Putin’s plan was falling into place. Those actions remind me of Germany in 1939 and Poland.

What now? Putin didn’t need 190,000 troops and a phalanx of tanks, thousands of artillery pieces, and a shipment of plasma to declare the eastern Ukrainian region independent. No, there is much more and this was long ago planned.

Looking into the future, expect Russia to keep large numbers of troops in Belarus, and many thousands inside eastern Ukraine. Also, recall that Putin and Belarus’s President Alexander Lukashenko declared the formation of a reaction force, a key indicator that Russia will hold its ground. Further, expect the geopolitical temperature to rise, subject in part to NATO and the West’s response, if any.

Will the Germans really kill Nord Stream 2, the pipeline from Russia?  Will Biden really pull the rug on Moscow’s access to SWIFT [Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications]? Don’t be too optimistic. After all, Italy is already waffling on Russian sanctions.  

The pragmatic Germans won’t let their economy suffer from a lack of energy, even though Biden said the Nord Stream 2 will "not move forward." Alternatively, former President Trump offered to sell U.S. natural gas to the EU and Germany as a counter to Russia. That should be revived.

The White House has already started walking back from the SWIFT sanctions, commenting that Russia is only formalizing in the East what everyone has already known. After all, this might be the "minor incursion" that Biden basically allowed Putin in a January 2022 speech. Question is, did Biden secretly agree in advance to allow Putin to do this? Or are we to believe this is a coincidence?

Meanwhile, assuming Putin’s latest land grab holds, then in time – perhaps next winter – the Kremlin’s authoritarian will continue to whittle away at the fringes of Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Warsaw Pact. Expect Moldova to be next; after all, Moscow already has troops in that tiny country.

Further, the Ukraine kerfuffle will energize communist China’s President Xi Jinping to launch his campaign against Taiwan, which might not happen immediately but looks more certain thanks to Putin’s growing encroachment into Europe.

President Biden’s promised harsh sanctions won’t slow Putin, much less the slap on the hand he announced following Tuesday’s invasion. After all, these actions are already calculated into the mix, and besides, expect China to launder much of what the Russians really need to continue operations, such as purchasing any excess oil and gas that the West may sanction. Further, and this is important, read the February 4, 2022 joint communique released by thugs Putin and Xi at the launch of the 2022 Beijing Olympics. They are now more joined at the hip than ever before. And yes, we are in a new Cold War.

Perhaps this new Cold War isn’t exactly like the one that ended with the demise of the former Soviet Union in 1991. However, it is real and just as threatening. My 2018 book, "Alliance of Evil," is now proving to be absolutely correct in that China and Russia are fulfilling their intent, and that comes at the expense of freedom seeking people across the world.  

What are America’s interests in the current Ukraine-related crisis? There are at least four interests.

First, as a NATO member, we are obligated under Article 5 to come to the aid if an alliance member is attacked. That could happen. 

Second, Putin seeks to replace Europe’s current security infrastructure that grants Moscow more oversight. Already we’ve seen the French and German leadership caving on that front. 

Third, Americans will experience not just higher energy prices but security costs will escalate due to our demonstrated weakness and NATO skepticism about our staying power.

Finally, sovereign nations across the world will make decisions where they stand based on their view of both Russia and China, the world’s rising power.  

President Biden’s term in office set the stage for these radical changes and could act as an accelerant to something far worse on the horizon. 


Robert Maginnis is a retired U.S. Army officer and an experienced military analyst with on-the-ground experience inside Russia and Ukraine and the author of a number of books that address the Russia and China threat, including "Give Me Liberty, Not Marxism" (2021).  

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Trump White House and Residences Spied On


John Durham: Trump White House and Residences Spied On

Jack Phillips, The Epoch Times 

Special counsel John Durham’s team alleged on Feb. 12 that a tech executive aligned with the Democratic Party spied on former President Donald Trump’s residences and the White House when Trump was president.

Durham said in a court filing (pdf) that the spying took place in order to establish an “inference” and “narrative” to tie Trump to the Russian government. Durham’s office made the claim as part of his investigation that had brought charges against Michael Sussmann, a lawyer who had worked on behalf of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and who is currently charged with making a false statement to the FBI.

Durham alleged Sussmann “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign,” according to a section in the court filing, titled “Factual Background.”

Billing records he obtained suggest that Sussmann “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations” and that the unnamed technology executive met and communicated with Mark Elias, a lawyer who has filed numerous election-related lawsuits on behalf of the Democrats. Sussman previously pleaded not guilty and accused Durham of acting in a politically motivated manner.

“Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract,” Durham’s filing states.

The executive also “tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” the filing states, adding that the technology firm that the executive worked for “had come to access and maintain dedicated servers” for Trump’s executive office.

“Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump,” Durham’s filing reads. EOP refers to Trump’s office, while DNS traffic refers to traffic coming in and out of a server.

Durham further wrote that Sussmann “provided an updated set of allegations—including the Russian Bank-1 data and additional allegations relating to Trump” to another federal agency that isn’t the FBI. Claims that Sussmann provided in a meeting in February 2017 relied on “the purported DNS traffic that Tech Executive-1 and others had assembled pertaining to Trump Tower, Donald Trump’s New York City apartment building, the EOP, and the aforementioned health care provider,” according to Durham.

Sussmann, his court filing added, “provided data which he claimed reflected purportedly suspicious DNS lookups by these entities of internet protocol addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider” in the February 2017 meetings. Sussmann also said such DNS lookups “demonstrated that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations,” which Durham described as false.

“The Special Counsel’s Office has identified no support for these allegations,” Durham wrote. “Indeed, more complete DNS data that the Special Counsel’s Office obtained from a company that assisted Tech Executive-1 in assembling these allegations reflects that such DNS lookups were far from rare in the United States.”

Lawyers for Sussman, in response to the Durham filing, said Monday that the motion included “prejudicial—and false—allegations that are irrelevant to his motion and to the charged offense, and are plainly intended to politicize this case, inflame media coverage, and taint the jury pool.”

Information about DNS traffic in Durham’s filing was “not necessary to identify any of the potential conflicts of interest with which the motion is putatively concerned,” his lawyers added. “Why then include them? The question answers itself.”

After Durham’s court filing was unsealed, Trump on Feb. 12 issued a statement claiming it provided “indisputable evidence” his campaign and office were being spied on by Democrats in a bid to connect him to the Russian government. The former president has long decried the Trump–Russia collusion narrative as a falsified witch hunt designed to imperil his political chances while bolstering left-wing mainstream media outlets’ ratings.

“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution,” Trump stated.

And Kash Patel, a former U.S. intelligence official who hosts EpochTV’s “Kash’s Corner,” said the filing reveals a “most intricate and coordinated conspiracy” to target Trump while he was a candidate and later as president.



 

Sunday, February 13, 2022

Why Ideology Is The Ancient Enemy Of Civilization

 

Why Ideology Is The Ancient Enemy Of Civilization

Victor Davis Hanson, Daily Caller

What ultimately destroyed the evil empires of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia were bankrupt dogmas. Crackpot ideology destroyed free expression. It ruined meritocracy and ensured unequal application of the laws – and so paved the way for far worse.

The Nazi idea of a superior Aryan raceadjudicated everything from physics to tank design. Soviet commissars did the same, subordinating rational thought to communist agendas.

Zealots in both systems infiltrated the universities and schools to institutionalize indoctrination.

Wokeism, while not yet as lethal, is similar. Racial wokeism posits that the race and gender of the vice president and the next Supreme Court justice subordinate all other considerations.

But will the current vice president and next Supreme Court justice commensurately select their own future surgeons, or their upcoming airline pilots, on the same predetermined race and sex criteria?What – other than ideology – explains why rejecting nominations of African American judge Janice Rogers Brown in 2003 and 2005 was not racist and sexist, but blocking Joe Biden’s upcoming nomination of a preselected African American female would be?

Why were most Antifa and Black Lives Matter criminals who looted, destroyed and assaulted during the 120 days of summer 2020 not charged, much less tried? Why, in contrast, were the January 6 rioters or the current Canadian truckers treated disproportionately harshly by the media?

Had the same rioters on January 6 been waving pride flags and BLM banners, would some of them have been sitting for a year in solitary confinement and still uncharged?

Had the criminal protestors and looters of summer 2020 been wearing red MAGA hats, would they also have mostly gotten off without charges?

What would have happened had conservative demonstrators cut out a police-free “MAGA Zone” in Seattle rather than the exempted Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone? Would police have similarly left it alone, and the media similarly romanticized such illegality?

One of the reasons the COVID-19 lockdown and mask policies lost public confidence was their utter corruption by ideology.

When thousands in June 2020 brazenly defied quarantines – and yet were excused by over 1,000 health care professionals claiming that woke agendas justified violating quarantine laws – then millions of Americans concluded government policy was as much about identity politics as saving lives.

Which politicians in 2020 trashed the vaccine programs and declared they would likely not get inoculations – if they were endorsed by then-President Donald Trump?

If Trump is demonized as a destroyer of election legitimacy, what then are we to say of the beatified Stacey Abrams? She lost the Georgia gubernatorial race by more than 50,000 votes. Yet for years, she has maintained the voting was rigged and the elected governor is illegitimate.In 2000, who challenged for weeks the vote count, despite numerous public and private audits confirming George W. Bush’s popular vote victory in Florida?

Who in 2004-2005 – for only the second time in history – challenged in Congress the Electoral College vote? In whose party were the 31 House members and one senator who forced a congressional vote in a failed effort to overturn the election?

Who in 2016 ran ads for weeks after the election, beseeching the chosen electors to violate their constitutional duties, ignore their state vote tallies, and instead vote for Hillary Clinton?

And who in 2016 claimed her victorious opponent was elected president illegitimately? Who bragged she was joining the “resistance” to undermine his presidency? Who advised Joe Biden in 2020 not to accept the election result if he lost?

If conservative zealots were ransacking American stores, carjacking innocents in the major cities, and spiking murder rates to historical highs, would the Biden administration be mobilizing law enforcement to ensure arrests, prosecutions, and incarceration? Would current city and county prosecutors continue to turn a blind eye?

If anti-communist Cubans by the millions were illegally crashing the southern border, would they be welcomed in as are those from Mexico and Central Americans?

If, by 2024, a Republican president enjoys a Republican Congress, what would be the reaction to conservatives who advocated ending the filibuster? Ensuring a national voting law requiring IDs at all the polls? Voting to increase the Supreme Court to 15 justices to guarantee at least six new nominations for the Republican-controlled presidency and Congress?

When ideology in places like Castroite Cuba, the old Soviet Union, and Venezuela warped the application of the law, destroyed the role of merit in assessing qualifications, silenced speech, and unequally applied the law, then society unwound.

In such ideological dystopias, eventually even the shelves empty, the currency becomes worthless, and the nation regresses into poverty and chaos. Is that the future we await?

Scarier still, ideology ensures that such chaos is heralded as success. Critics are demonized and hounded. And the obsequious state media assures the public that things are going just great.

Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness. He is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author of “The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict Was Fought and Won,” from Basic Books. You can reach him by e-mailing authorvdh@gmail.com.


Saturday, February 05, 2022

Awakened a Sleeping Tiger

Educational Elites Have Awakened a Sleeping Tiger

Ashley Varner, Real Clear Policy

Perhaps predictably, many public schools kicked off 2022 by switching back to remote learning — or canceling classes altogether — leaving frustrated parents across the country frantically searching for more consistent schooling options.

These past two school years of remote and hybrid learning, forced masking, and an intensified culture of unpredictability has pushed teachers, administrators, students, and parents to very edge. What began as a temporary interruption to student learning has become a vicious cycle of confusion, inconsistency and lost educational time.

Thanks to the unreliability of distance learning, children are retaining less of what they’ve learned, reading at lower grade levels and suffering from a lack of social interaction. There is little to no support for children who rely on school to provide a safe haven from difficult home lives, and students in free or reduced meal plans have a harder time receiving them.

As school policies continue to isolate students from friends and peers, such as forcing students to eat their lunch outside on buckets, or facing the same direction without talking, the tragic numbers of adolescent depression, anxiety, and suicide continue to rise.

Millions of exasperated parents, many in deep-blue cities and states, are desperately pursuing educational alternatives that better suit their families’ needs and values. Parents are enrolling their children in private and charter schools in droves, while those without the financial means to do so remain stuck in a system captive to the whims of teachers’ unions and indifferent school boards.

Many teachers are going above and beyond in the name of what is best for kids, but their ability to truly innovate and explore new ways of teaching and inspire learning is being blocked by the unnecessarily restrictive demands of union leadership.

These unions tend to operate at state and national levels in ways that do not represent most of their members. Rather than sticking up for these vulnerable children, unions — as recently exemplified by the Chicago Teachers Union — are prioritizing strikes, walkouts and funding political campaigns, halting true progress as students remain stranded at home. 

Fed-up teachers across the country have resigned their union membership, tired of their dues dollars funding an agenda they don’t support.

Thankfully, this power-flexing by the educational elites has also awakened a sleeping tiger — parents who care far more about their children’s education than the radical political agenda embraced by teachers’ union leaders.

Many parents are recognizing now more than ever the importance of school choice. Rather than forcing families to fit their children into an outdated, one-size-fits-all template, we now have the opportunity a build a new educational model that offers a wider variety of schooling options designed to fit the families it serves.

Parents are increasingly empowered to choose whatever type of education is best for their family, and they’re seizing this opportunity in a grassroots movement that is sweeping the country.

None of which is to suggest public schools can’t be saved. Our education system must be fixed, not abandoned.

Despite its boast of enhancing opportunities for everyone, remote learning has perpetuated the gap between the “haves” and the “have-nots.” Parents who lack the financial means to switch their children to in-person learning at private or charter schools — whether it be for a better educational experience or simply because they can’t afford to stay home from work to supervise remote learning — have no choice but to remain in public school.

We must find the courage to improve and innovate the public education system and put first what’s best for students and families, rather than national teachers’ unions.

Perhaps most importantly, parents and teachers alike must remember the power they have in making their voices heard. Though millions of angry parents will be going to the polls this November, it’s important they work to enact change now by calling school administrators, district superintendents and school boards to let them know they don’t support union agendas running their kids’ schools.

It’s time we set aside politics and remembered who education is meant to serve, and the futures we are fighting for. 


Ashley Varner is vice president of communications and federal affairs at the Freedom Foundation.